Why Barack Obama is more popular in Canada than Stephen Harper.

Why Barack Obama is more popular in Canada than Stephen Harper.

Why Barack Obama is more popular in Canada than Stephen Harper.

Who's winning, who's losing, and why.
Feb. 19 2009 6:41 PM

Yes, We Can, Eh?

How Canadians are dealing with an American president they actually like.

Obama and Harper. Click image to expand.
U.S. President Barack Obama and Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper

There is a pattern to U.S. presidential visits familiar to many Canadians. First, there is eager anticipation after an election—will Canada be blessed with the new president's first foreign visit? That tradition was upset by George W. Bush in 2001, who went to Mexico first. (He's making up for it by giving an early post-presidential speech in a welcoming petro-emirate: Calgary.) Then, there is the search for a personal connection to Canada. Bush disappointed here again—but President Obama's brother-in-law is from Burlington, Ontario! Finally, there is the attempt by Canadian institutions to steal some of the presidential limelight. Among the most popular, but perhaps the most provincial, was a CBC Radio contest inviting Canadians to stuff Obama's iPod with Canadian songs. (Congratulations, Joni Mitchell and Malajube; better luck next time, Steppenwolf and Céline Dion.)

The key to any first meeting between president and prime minister is establishing a good personal working relationship. Brian Mulroney and Ronald Reagan's duet on "When Irish Eyes Are Smiling" at an Irish-themed summit in Quebec City was a high point, while Lyndon Johnson's manhandling of Lester B. Pearson  is best forgotten. What do Obama and Prime Minister Stephen Harper share? Apparently, kids of a similar age and an enjoyment of policy wonkery. (Harper, however, has yet to share in Obama's cross-border appeal—the "Americans for Harper" site awaits your registration.)

Today's visit, with almost four hours of total face time for Harper, was long enough for both men to engage in some serious policy talk. Three issues dominate the public conversation in Canada about the U.S. relationship: free trade; Afghanistan, where Canada has sustained 108 combat deaths since 2002 with a deployment of about 2,700 troops; and climate change, oil, and energy issues.

Canadians are occasionally aware, as Obama's U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice once said, that they are like "the shy, admiring boy who gets all spiffed up to win the heart of his dreamboat, while she doesn't even know he exists." So in addition to the government-to-government contacts, Canadians, and some Americans, are doing end runs around that formal relationship—attempting to shape responses to free trade, political, economic, and climate change challenges in new ways.


On the issue of free trade, the Buy America provision of the stimulus bill states: "None of the funds appropriated or otherwise made available by this Act may be used for a project for the construction, alteration, maintenance, or repair of a public building or public work unless all of the iron, steel, and manufactured goods used in the project are produced in the United States." This is a huge challenge to Canada, which sends more than 80 percent of its exports to the United States. Despite all that talk you've heard about China, Canada is still the U.S.'s largest trading partner, with more than $550 billion in goods and services crossing the border each year.

Nobody knows precisely how Canada would be affected by this provision. But it has caused a collective shudder—especially in Ontario, the country's manufacturing center, where auto manufacturing is heavily integrated with the United States. "We're deeply concerned," says Thomas d'Aquino of the Canadian Council of Chief Executives, the country's main big-business lobby. "It could apply to anything." Globe and Mail blogger Andrew Steele puts it bluntly: "If Obama leaves the meeting thinking anything but 'gotta stop Congress from screwing the Canadians on trade' it is a failure of a meeting." Ontario's International Trade Minister Sandra Pupatello is more optimistic, saying she has been encouraged by her conversations with American officials and auto executives.

But there's hardly national agreement on the value of free trade to Canada in the first place. A June 2008 poll shows that as many Canadians think free trade has been bad for the country as think it's been good, and 60 percent think the United States has benefited more. This ambivalence may help explain the Canadian Auto Workers union's call for a "Buy Canadian" policy to apply to any future Canadian stimulus package. This is especially remarkable because CAW members staff many of those Canadian auto plants that could be threatened by the Buy America plan.